I'm glad we are on the same page on this and many other issues. I refused to e-file for data security reasons. Until I get a direct connection to the IRS, I won't e-file.

The tax prep software industry made a deal with the IRS: they offer "free file" program to low income people, in exchange, the IRS promised not to offer e-file directly to the taxpaypers. In effect the IRS carved out a sizable business to the industry. The "free file" program is very much like a customer acquisition tool. College students with low income qualify for free file. They use it and get hooked on it. After they don't qualify for it any more, they will likely continue using it and pay for it because (a) it has their data and (b) they are already familiar with it.

Right now, I print out about 20 pages of tax documents. I drive them to the post office. I wait in line. I pay perhaps $5 for stamps. The returns go onto a truck to the airport. They ride on a plane to Utah, where the whole process is reversed. The IRS scans them into a computer. How ridiculous.

E-file should be so easy. No paper, no cars, no lines, no stamps, no planes, no scanners. My computer hooks up to the IRS and sends the data over. It should save me money and time, and it should save the IRS money and time.

AND YET I HAVE NO OPTIONS FOR DOING THIS!

For some completely inexplicable reason, I have to pay money to e-file. If it saves everyone involved effort, why should I have to pay for it? Adding insult to injury, the IRS advertises their "freefile" system, which offers free e-file to poor people. No doubt subsidized with my e-file dollars. Screw that. To me, that seems like an effort to convince poor people to spend money for computer tax software.

So I refuse to pay to e-file. I refuse to e-file for "free after rebate". The $10 fee isn't the reason, it's the principle of the thing. I write my congressmen every year to complain about this issue.