<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Risks in Money Market Funds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancebuff.com/2007/08/risks-in-money-market-funds.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/2007/08/risks-in-money-market-funds.html</link>
	<description>like a friend telling you about money ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:44:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/2007/08/risks-in-money-market-funds.html/comment-page-1#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thefinancebuff.com/?p=150#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Anyone that believes that anything in this world is &quot;100% safe&quot; is deluding them self.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone that believes that anything in this world is &#034;100% safe&#034; is deluding them self.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/2007/08/risks-in-money-market-funds.html/comment-page-1#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thefinancebuff.com/?p=150#comment-210</guid>
		<description>I agree partly with your post, but would note that many people who put cash in money markets do so because they believe it to be 100% safe.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You point out that in fact it is not 100% safe. Even worse, there is at least some correlation between the solvency of the money market funds and the companies issuing the debt they are investing in.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is precisely what you don&#039;t want. Part of the point of diversification (stocks, bonds, cash) is to ensure that when one portion of the portfolio suffers, the others help take up the slack.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In fact, in the case of a complete economic meltdown (as would need to occur for equity index funds to suffer massive losses), I explicitly do not want my &quot;cash&quot; accounts to suffer similar fates.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I moved several large money market holdings from Vanguard Prime to the Admiral Treasury funds yesterday. I live in a high tax state, so the yield difference is very small and the extra security seems worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree partly with your post, but would note that many people who put cash in money markets do so because they believe it to be 100% safe.</p>
<p>You point out that in fact it is not 100% safe. Even worse, there is at least some correlation between the solvency of the money market funds and the companies issuing the debt they are investing in.</p>
<p>This is precisely what you don&#039;t want. Part of the point of diversification (stocks, bonds, cash) is to ensure that when one portion of the portfolio suffers, the others help take up the slack.</p>
<p>In fact, in the case of a complete economic meltdown (as would need to occur for equity index funds to suffer massive losses), I explicitly do not want my &#034;cash&#034; accounts to suffer similar fates.</p>
<p>I moved several large money market holdings from Vanguard Prime to the Admiral Treasury funds yesterday. I live in a high tax state, so the yield difference is very small and the extra security seems worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
