<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Austin Frakt on NPR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/10/austin-frakt-on-npr.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/10/austin-frakt-on-npr.html</link>
	<description>like a friend telling you about money ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:52:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/10/austin-frakt-on-npr.html/comment-page-1#comment-2833</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/10/austin-frakt-on-npr.html#comment-2833</guid>
		<description>I had this running debate with this person some months ago over how to really, really reduce health care costs. I really, really, doubted whether a &quot;medicare-for-all&quot; plan would do the trick, since it addressed only the &quot;coverage&quot; side and not the &quot;cost&quot; side. I submitted that monopsony (his term, but appropriate) would not affect costs so long as pay-per-service dominated. I was also amused by this week&#039;s &quot;Sixty Minutes&quot; hit piece on Medicare fraud. Increase the coverage, increase the fraud? I still submit the only really effective way to curb costs is to curb coverage, payments to providers, and procedures to &quot;granny&quot;. That&#039;s a non-starter, so you folks age forty and under get ready to pay the price for my  Medicare ear-lobe replacement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had this running debate with this person some months ago over how to really, really reduce health care costs. I really, really, doubted whether a &#8220;medicare-for-all&#8221; plan would do the trick, since it addressed only the &#8220;coverage&#8221; side and not the &#8220;cost&#8221; side. I submitted that monopsony (his term, but appropriate) would not affect costs so long as pay-per-service dominated. I was also amused by this week&#8217;s &#8220;Sixty Minutes&#8221; hit piece on Medicare fraud. Increase the coverage, increase the fraud? I still submit the only really effective way to curb costs is to curb coverage, payments to providers, and procedures to &#8220;granny&#8221;. That&#8217;s a non-starter, so you folks age forty and under get ready to pay the price for my  Medicare ear-lobe replacement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin Frakt</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/10/austin-frakt-on-npr.html/comment-page-1#comment-2825</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Frakt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/10/austin-frakt-on-npr.html#comment-2825</guid>
		<description>@TFB - Thank you! Those were kind words. I&#039;m glad you still read my posts.

And to think, I&#039;d still be toiling in obscurity, my policy-relevant work unknown to the world, if it hadn&#039;t been for your invitation to co-blog with you back in March. That launched me into blogging and the rest is history. (So have you selected your next protege?)

A note for your readers: I still have some personal finance content on my blog and that will continue. But my focus has moved to a more economics and health policy one. I also have a co-blogger who is an antitrust attorney and he&#039;ll be educating us on legal matters. Your questions and thoughts are always welcome.

See you in the blogosphere!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TFB &#8211; Thank you! Those were kind words. I&#8217;m glad you still read my posts.</p>
<p>And to think, I&#8217;d still be toiling in obscurity, my policy-relevant work unknown to the world, if it hadn&#8217;t been for your invitation to co-blog with you back in March. That launched me into blogging and the rest is history. (So have you selected your next protege?)</p>
<p>A note for your readers: I still have some personal finance content on my blog and that will continue. But my focus has moved to a more economics and health policy one. I also have a co-blogger who is an antitrust attorney and he&#8217;ll be educating us on legal matters. Your questions and thoughts are always welcome.</p>
<p>See you in the blogosphere!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
