<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: International Markets On Sale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancebuff.com/emerging-markets-on-sale.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/emerging-markets-on-sale.html</link>
	<description>like a friend telling you about money ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFB</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/emerging-markets-on-sale.html#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>TFB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2008/08/emerging-markets-on-sale.html#comment-837</guid>
		<description>arvind - I don&#039;t know where the market is going. I don&#039;t subscribe to any &quot;system&quot; which attempts to forecast where the market is going either. Because I have to buy &lt;i&gt;something&lt;/i&gt;, I buy whatever I&#039;m low on. See previous post &lt;a href=&quot;http://thefinancebuff.com/2007/10/rebalancing-with-new-cash.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rebalance With New Cash&lt;/a&gt;.

indexfundfan - If only they remove that $3,000/year limit on income offset!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>arvind &#8211; I don&#8217;t know where the market is going. I don&#8217;t subscribe to any &#8220;system&#8221; which attempts to forecast where the market is going either. Because I have to buy <i>something</i>, I buy whatever I&#8217;m low on. See previous post <a href="http://thefinancebuff.com/2007/10/rebalancing-with-new-cash.html" rel="nofollow">Rebalance With New Cash</a>.</p>
<p>indexfundfan &#8211; If only they remove that $3,000/year limit on income offset!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indexfundfan</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/emerging-markets-on-sale.html#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>indexfundfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2008/08/emerging-markets-on-sale.html#comment-836</guid>
		<description>The fall in EAFE has kept me busy with tax-loss harvesting. I now have enough losses to offset my income for the next several years (assuming I do not have capital gains). This is one &#039;benefit&#039; of a bear market. LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fall in EAFE has kept me busy with tax-loss harvesting. I now have enough losses to offset my income for the next several years (assuming I do not have capital gains). This is one &#8216;benefit&#8217; of a bear market. LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arvind</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/emerging-markets-on-sale.html#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>arvind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2008/08/emerging-markets-on-sale.html#comment-835</guid>
		<description>But is the logic &quot;The market will eventually have to come back up&quot; always a good one? For instance, that logic would have backfired if we had bet on Nasdaq when it was down 20% from its late 90s highs or on Asian markets when they started to go down and eventually crashed.
 
I am wondering if something like the &quot;Matt Blackman&quot; trading  strategy should be used to see if indeed there is a high probability the market will eventuall come back up? 

The strategy specified in Wikipedia is &quot;Matt Blackman has examined a trading strategy using P/E ratio involving staying out of the market when P/E&#039;s 2 year SMA falls below 5 year SMA. It resulted in capturing 91% of the gain by staying in the market for only 42% of the time.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But is the logic &#8220;The market will eventually have to come back up&#8221; always a good one? For instance, that logic would have backfired if we had bet on Nasdaq when it was down 20% from its late 90s highs or on Asian markets when they started to go down and eventually crashed.</p>
<p>I am wondering if something like the &#8220;Matt Blackman&#8221; trading  strategy should be used to see if indeed there is a high probability the market will eventuall come back up? </p>
<p>The strategy specified in Wikipedia is &#8220;Matt Blackman has examined a trading strategy using P/E ratio involving staying out of the market when P/E&#8217;s 2 year SMA falls below 5 year SMA. It resulted in capturing 91% of the gain by staying in the market for only 42% of the time.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

