<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Investing Is Simple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancebuff.com/investing-is-simple.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/investing-is-simple.html</link>
	<description>like a friend telling you about money ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:31:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Braveheart</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2783</link>
		<dc:creator>Braveheart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/09/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2783</guid>
		<description>TFB or Mike Piper,

If you can e-mail me the text for Chapter 6 and provide some independent evidence on why index funds win, I will be happy to purchase this book. The biggest hole in index fund logic is that it cannot exist without active management. Actively managed investments drive market efficiency and therefore create market capitalization weighted indices. It&#039;s amazing how blindly people accept academic research papers and their conclusions. Of course mutual funds don&#039;t beat cap weighted indices on average, the only way that would be possible is if institutional separate accounts, hedge funds, and retail accounts in aggregate had inferior performance GROSS of the average expense ratio. Index funds are a great tool for investors not willing to put the time and effort into thoroughly researching actively managed investment options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TFB or Mike Piper,</p>
<p>If you can e-mail me the text for Chapter 6 and provide some independent evidence on why index funds win, I will be happy to purchase this book. The biggest hole in index fund logic is that it cannot exist without active management. Actively managed investments drive market efficiency and therefore create market capitalization weighted indices. It&#8217;s amazing how blindly people accept academic research papers and their conclusions. Of course mutual funds don&#8217;t beat cap weighted indices on average, the only way that would be possible is if institutional separate accounts, hedge funds, and retail accounts in aggregate had inferior performance GROSS of the average expense ratio. Index funds are a great tool for investors not willing to put the time and effort into thoroughly researching actively managed investment options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simplesimon</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator>simplesimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/09/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2710</guid>
		<description>I linked the book as a note on my Facebook profile so hopefully my friends can take charge of their finances too.

A couple things that are really minor and just nitpicky because that&#039;s how I am:
Actually, I&#039;ll preface it with the disclaimer that I haven&#039;t read the book in its entirety, just briefly skimmed it and stopped mostly for the nice graphs and charts. 

Ok here we go...both things have to do with the graph on page 23 regarding what $1000 is worth after investing from 1928-2008...
1) The graph is a little misleading because it&#039;s not a semilog graph.
2) The $91,893 stated there is in 1928 dollars, correct?  I just thought that was interesting.

The book does look great, very simple, and easy to understand.  I hope many of my friends read it and greatly improve their chances of retirement!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I linked the book as a note on my Facebook profile so hopefully my friends can take charge of their finances too.</p>
<p>A couple things that are really minor and just nitpicky because that&#8217;s how I am:<br />
Actually, I&#8217;ll preface it with the disclaimer that I haven&#8217;t read the book in its entirety, just briefly skimmed it and stopped mostly for the nice graphs and charts. </p>
<p>Ok here we go&#8230;both things have to do with the graph on page 23 regarding what $1000 is worth after investing from 1928-2008&#8230;<br />
1) The graph is a little misleading because it&#8217;s not a semilog graph.<br />
2) The $91,893 stated there is in 1928 dollars, correct?  I just thought that was interesting.</p>
<p>The book does look great, very simple, and easy to understand.  I hope many of my friends read it and greatly improve their chances of retirement!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/09/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2706</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, and thanks to Mr. Piper for allowing us to read his book. I&#039;m retired (my wife is still working and contributing to her 401K). I have been in index funds almost exclusively since I became eligible for our firm&#039;s 401K (in 1983). I can personally vouch for them as the best way to invest.

However, what is really needed is a &quot;simple&quot;-type book on how to &quot;dis-accumulate&quot; once one hits retirement. I personally plan to use the 4% SWR once my wife retires. I have used various on-line calculators, as well as doing the math &quot;by hand&quot; with a pocket calculator, and it appears that a very modest real rate of return of 1% (average yield minus inflation) will enable a 4% SWR to last between 28 and 29 years. However, the literature is all over the map on SWRs. I read one paper authored by several Stanford-affiliated academics (referenced on the Boglehead Wiki) and my eyes glazed over. There are so many issues we face as retirees: annuities, SWRs, Medicare and related expenses (how much will that &quot;supplemental&quot; insurance cost and should I buy it or risk the 20% Part B co-pay?), bonds versus CDs, I could go on and on. I&#039;d love a link to such a book (if it exists and isn&#039;t peddled by some entity pushing a product).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, and thanks to Mr. Piper for allowing us to read his book. I&#8217;m retired (my wife is still working and contributing to her 401K). I have been in index funds almost exclusively since I became eligible for our firm&#8217;s 401K (in 1983). I can personally vouch for them as the best way to invest.</p>
<p>However, what is really needed is a &#8220;simple&#8221;-type book on how to &#8220;dis-accumulate&#8221; once one hits retirement. I personally plan to use the 4% SWR once my wife retires. I have used various on-line calculators, as well as doing the math &#8220;by hand&#8221; with a pocket calculator, and it appears that a very modest real rate of return of 1% (average yield minus inflation) will enable a 4% SWR to last between 28 and 29 years. However, the literature is all over the map on SWRs. I read one paper authored by several Stanford-affiliated academics (referenced on the Boglehead Wiki) and my eyes glazed over. There are so many issues we face as retirees: annuities, SWRs, Medicare and related expenses (how much will that &#8220;supplemental&#8221; insurance cost and should I buy it or risk the 20% Part B co-pay?), bonds versus CDs, I could go on and on. I&#8217;d love a link to such a book (if it exists and isn&#8217;t peddled by some entity pushing a product).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFB</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2703</link>
		<dc:creator>TFB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/09/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2703</guid>
		<description>akb - New cash has been going to bonds since the market rebound. Stocks/bonds ratio stands at 75/25 right now, still higher than usual. Overbalancing not completely unwound yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>akb &#8211; New cash has been going to bonds since the market rebound. Stocks/bonds ratio stands at 75/25 right now, still higher than usual. Overbalancing not completely unwound yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wolfinger</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2702</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wolfinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/09/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2702</guid>
		<description>Simple.  Yes indeed it is.

But is it effective?  Does it provide the protection that&#039;s needed when the markets tumble?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple.  Yes indeed it is.</p>
<p>But is it effective?  Does it provide the protection that&#8217;s needed when the markets tumble?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Piper</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2701</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Piper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/09/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2701</guid>
		<description>Hi Robert. I&#039;m happy to hear you liked the book. :)

If you know anyone else who might benefit from it, please feel free to share it with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert. I&#8217;m happy to hear you liked the book. <img src='http://thefinancebuff.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If you know anyone else who might benefit from it, please feel free to share it with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2698</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/09/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2698</guid>
		<description>I just read most of this book.  I must say it&#039;s a great read.  Thanks for the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read most of this book.  I must say it&#8217;s a great read.  Thanks for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akb</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2697</link>
		<dc:creator>akb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/09/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2697</guid>
		<description>TFB, I&#039;m curious if you are doing the equivalent of your &quot;over-rebalancing&quot; on the way down, now that things have gone up dramatically?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TFB, I&#8217;m curious if you are doing the equivalent of your &#8220;over-rebalancing&#8221; on the way down, now that things have gone up dramatically?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Piper</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2696</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Piper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/09/investing-is-simple.html#comment-2696</guid>
		<description>Wow. Thanks for mentioning the book on your blog and for the kind words about it. :)

I hope your readers find it helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Thanks for mentioning the book on your blog and for the kind words about it. <img src='http://thefinancebuff.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I hope your readers find it helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

