<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NetBank Shuts Down, ING Takes Over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancebuff.com/netbank-shuts-down-ing-takes-over.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/netbank-shuts-down-ing-takes-over.html</link>
	<description>like a friend telling you about money ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 00:03:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/netbank-shuts-down-ing-takes-over.html#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thefinancebuff.com/?p=175#comment-271</guid>
		<description>tfb,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks - &quot;Good Answer&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tfb,</p>
<p>Thanks &#8211; &#8220;Good Answer&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFB</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/netbank-shuts-down-ing-takes-over.html#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>TFB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thefinancebuff.com/?p=175#comment-264</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it should be raised. 100% coverage all the way to $100k by FDIC creates a huge moral hazard problem. It rewards bad banks like NetBank with fresh cash and encourages the race to the bottom. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think FDIC insurance should have multiple levels. Well run banks get higher coverage, lower deductible and/or copay. Badly run banks get lower coverage, higher deductible and/or copay. That way banks will have incentives to run a tighter ship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it should be raised. 100% coverage all the way to $100k by FDIC creates a huge moral hazard problem. It rewards bad banks like NetBank with fresh cash and encourages the race to the bottom. </p>
<p>I think FDIC insurance should have multiple levels. Well run banks get higher coverage, lower deductible and/or copay. Badly run banks get lower coverage, higher deductible and/or copay. That way banks will have incentives to run a tighter ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/netbank-shuts-down-ing-takes-over.html#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thefinancebuff.com/?p=175#comment-263</guid>
		<description>The FDIC max has been stuck at 100K for quite a while now - do you think it will be raised anytime soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FDIC max has been stuck at 100K for quite a while now &#8211; do you think it will be raised anytime soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

