<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old Money Versus New Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancebuff.com/old-money-versus-new-money.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/old-money-versus-new-money.html</link>
	<description>like a friend telling you about money ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:31:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFB</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/old-money-versus-new-money.html#comment-1157</link>
		<dc:creator>TFB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2008/11/old-money-versus-new-money.html#comment-1157</guid>
		<description>Dollar cost averaging makes sense if you suspect that the market is too high or if you are not sure what your ultimate asset allocation will be. So you start dipping your toe into the market while figuring out your long-term plan. Dollar cost averaging wins if the market goes down. It loses if the market goes up. But then if the market goes down, simply waiting works better than dollar cost averaging. Without a crystal ball for where the market will go, dollar cost averaging can be considered a compromise. For more on investing a lump sum all at once versus buying over time, see previous post &lt;a href=&quot;http://thefinancebuff.com/2008/01/buy-now-or-buy-gradually-over-time.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Buy Now Or Buy Gradually Over Time?&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dollar cost averaging makes sense if you suspect that the market is too high or if you are not sure what your ultimate asset allocation will be. So you start dipping your toe into the market while figuring out your long-term plan. Dollar cost averaging wins if the market goes down. It loses if the market goes up. But then if the market goes down, simply waiting works better than dollar cost averaging. Without a crystal ball for where the market will go, dollar cost averaging can be considered a compromise. For more on investing a lump sum all at once versus buying over time, see previous post <a href="http://thefinancebuff.com/2008/01/buy-now-or-buy-gradually-over-time.html" rel="nofollow">Buy Now Or Buy Gradually Over Time?</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calgeek</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/old-money-versus-new-money.html#comment-1156</link>
		<dc:creator>calgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2008/11/old-money-versus-new-money.html#comment-1156</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree it is artificial to distinguish between old money and new money.  But does this say it never makes sense to dollar cost average a lump of cash (as opposed to buying over time because you have no choice)?  I often wonder if the former kind of DCA only has emotional value, i.e. you feel you got a fair price because the market is more efficient over a larger time window.  What does do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree it is artificial to distinguish between old money and new money.  But does this say it never makes sense to dollar cost average a lump of cash (as opposed to buying over time because you have no choice)?  I often wonder if the former kind of DCA only has emotional value, i.e. you feel you got a fair price because the market is more efficient over a larger time window.  What does do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennydecki</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/old-money-versus-new-money.html#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>jennydecki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2008/11/old-money-versus-new-money.html#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>This is a great post. I&#039;m glad I&#039;m not the only one who feels this way about new money. 

Knowing that it is a typical reaction, it will be much easier to talk myself out of illogical emotions tied to new money in the future. Before? It was an all out argument with myself that had me looking like a crazy woman LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post. I&#8217;m glad I&#8217;m not the only one who feels this way about new money. </p>
<p>Knowing that it is a typical reaction, it will be much easier to talk myself out of illogical emotions tied to new money in the future. Before? It was an all out argument with myself that had me looking like a crazy woman LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: commish</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/old-money-versus-new-money.html#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>commish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2008/11/old-money-versus-new-money.html#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>mark me down as guilty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mark me down as guilty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

