<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TurboTax, TaxCut, and TaxACT Compared Side By Side</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancebuff.com/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html</link>
	<description>like a friend telling you about money ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:12:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-5829</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/02/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-5829</guid>
		<description>This year Taxcut and Turbotax do not import data from my rentals (addresses, basis, and so on) . Last year they did do that. Means a lot more work for me entering all the rental addresses, basis and so on. Why did they change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year Taxcut and Turbotax do not import data from my rentals (addresses, basis, and so on) . Last year they did do that. Means a lot more work for me entering all the rental addresses, basis and so on. Why did they change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FairTaxFan</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-2316</link>
		<dc:creator>FairTaxFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/02/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-2316</guid>
		<description>Has anyone tried TaxBrain?  They charge $69.95 for their top package, plus $29.95 to add on the state return, but they also offer discount codes up to possibly $30, but that still makes it the most expensive I have seen.  Is there something better with TaxBrain over TaxAct?  Or the others?  I am self-employed, so need to use Schedule C and other forms that force the Top Packages apparently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone tried TaxBrain?  They charge $69.95 for their top package, plus $29.95 to add on the state return, but they also offer discount codes up to possibly $30, but that still makes it the most expensive I have seen.  Is there something better with TaxBrain over TaxAct?  Or the others?  I am self-employed, so need to use Schedule C and other forms that force the Top Packages apparently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guraaf</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1881</link>
		<dc:creator>Guraaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/02/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1881</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know if TurboTax or TaxAct handle foreign income and Form 1116 well enough?  I have a bank account in Switzerland and the bank interest income wasn&#039;t easily handled by H&amp;R TaxCut at all.  It wanted me to fill in the form and I had trouble doing so.

Thanks!
Guraaf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know if TurboTax or TaxAct handle foreign income and Form 1116 well enough?  I have a bank account in Switzerland and the bank interest income wasn&#8217;t easily handled by H&amp;R TaxCut at all.  It wanted me to fill in the form and I had trouble doing so.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Guraaf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFB</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>TFB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/02/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>@Itchy Brother - Unfortunately that&#039;s not the case. As soon as you enter any number in TaxCut, it&#039;s rounded to the whole dollar. The calculation continues from the whole dollar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Itchy Brother &#8211; Unfortunately that&#8217;s not the case. As soon as you enter any number in TaxCut, it&#8217;s rounded to the whole dollar. The calculation continues from the whole dollar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itchy Brother</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>Itchy Brother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/02/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>TFB,

Thanks for the reviews.

Regarding the TaxCut rounding issue, are you sure that TaxCut isn&#039;t just displaying rounded values while maintaining actual dollars and cents values internally?  In my opinion this would be a silly thing to do, but it wouldn&#039;t be the first time UI programmers have done things I think are silly.  I would be surprised to find the TC folks are ignorant of the law on this particular point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TFB,</p>
<p>Thanks for the reviews.</p>
<p>Regarding the TaxCut rounding issue, are you sure that TaxCut isn&#8217;t just displaying rounded values while maintaining actual dollars and cents values internally?  In my opinion this would be a silly thing to do, but it wouldn&#8217;t be the first time UI programmers have done things I think are silly.  I would be surprised to find the TC folks are ignorant of the law on this particular point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustAsking</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1748</link>
		<dc:creator>JustAsking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/02/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1748</guid>
		<description>I should also mention that TaxACT is cheaper than the others--their Ultimate version (federal and state) is $20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also mention that TaxACT is cheaper than the others&#8211;their Ultimate version (federal and state) is $20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustAsking</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1747</link>
		<dc:creator>JustAsking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/02/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1747</guid>
		<description>TFB,

Thanks for being ahead of the curve (as usual) in comparing these three. I tried TaxCut years ago and was annoyed by the way they took you by the hand and led you through like a dummy, asking questions that I could have just answered myself by filling out the tax forms. 

I just tried TurboTax but hated it for the same reason and gave up after an hour, uninstalled and returned it. As you point out, they ask a lot of irrelevant questions or those I don&#039;t want to have to figure out--and if I guess wrong, how will it affect my return, and will I be able to correct it easily? My feeling is, when you have to spend more time figuring out the software than the tax forms, it&#039;s easier to just do it on paper. True, you can use the forms in Turbo, but they&#039;re not really the same as the IRS forms--they have additional fields you have to fill out for the sake of the software.

I decided to try TaxACT, and it was a pleasant surprise to find that it&#039;s much more intuitive. They of course have the lead-you-by-the-hand option, but the forms are straight-up IRS clones in most cases, with automatic calculation. If you try to fill in a field that affects others, you get a message asking you to enter the info on the supporting document. (You can override, but it&#039;s not recommended and won&#039;t be automatically calculated.)

There were a few minor things I didn&#039;t like, but in speaking to tech support, I found that there are reasons for them, and I can certainly live with them. The software created a clean printout and corrected some math errors I had made on the paper version. I was impressed and will be using this again.

JA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TFB,</p>
<p>Thanks for being ahead of the curve (as usual) in comparing these three. I tried TaxCut years ago and was annoyed by the way they took you by the hand and led you through like a dummy, asking questions that I could have just answered myself by filling out the tax forms. </p>
<p>I just tried TurboTax but hated it for the same reason and gave up after an hour, uninstalled and returned it. As you point out, they ask a lot of irrelevant questions or those I don&#8217;t want to have to figure out&#8211;and if I guess wrong, how will it affect my return, and will I be able to correct it easily? My feeling is, when you have to spend more time figuring out the software than the tax forms, it&#8217;s easier to just do it on paper. True, you can use the forms in Turbo, but they&#8217;re not really the same as the IRS forms&#8211;they have additional fields you have to fill out for the sake of the software.</p>
<p>I decided to try TaxACT, and it was a pleasant surprise to find that it&#8217;s much more intuitive. They of course have the lead-you-by-the-hand option, but the forms are straight-up IRS clones in most cases, with automatic calculation. If you try to fill in a field that affects others, you get a message asking you to enter the info on the supporting document. (You can override, but it&#8217;s not recommended and won&#8217;t be automatically calculated.)</p>
<p>There were a few minor things I didn&#8217;t like, but in speaking to tech support, I found that there are reasons for them, and I can certainly live with them. The software created a clean printout and corrected some math errors I had made on the paper version. I was impressed and will be using this again.</p>
<p>JA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFB</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>TFB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/02/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>Irwin - Good for you for having a good income and not being hit with AMT. You are more likely to get AMT if you:

* have children; or
* live in a state with high state income tax or sales tax; or
* live in a place with high real estate price and property tax

I&#039;m guessing you don&#039;t have high state income tax and property tax.

indexfundfan is correct. My IRA contribution is not deductible. See previous post &lt;a href=&quot;http://thefinancebuff.com/2008/09/a-non-deductible-ira-is-worth-it-for-me.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Non-Deductible IRA Is Worth It For Me&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irwin &#8211; Good for you for having a good income and not being hit with AMT. You are more likely to get AMT if you:</p>
<p>* have children; or<br />
* live in a state with high state income tax or sales tax; or<br />
* live in a place with high real estate price and property tax</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing you don&#8217;t have high state income tax and property tax.</p>
<p>indexfundfan is correct. My IRA contribution is not deductible. See previous post <a href="http://thefinancebuff.com/2008/09/a-non-deductible-ira-is-worth-it-for-me.html" rel="nofollow">A Non-Deductible IRA Is Worth It For Me</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indexfundfan</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1638</link>
		<dc:creator>indexfundfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/02/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1638</guid>
		<description>Irwin, you can always contribute to a traditional IRA regardless of income. The question is whether the contribute is tax deductible or not -- you do not get a deduction when your income exceeds a certain threshold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irwin, you can always contribute to a traditional IRA regardless of income. The question is whether the contribute is tax deductible or not &#8212; you do not get a deduction when your income exceeds a certain threshold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irwin</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1637</link>
		<dc:creator>Irwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancebuff.com/2009/02/turbotax-taxcut-and-taxact-compared-side-by-side.html#comment-1637</guid>
		<description>TFB-    I hope this isn&#039;t too prying, but how can you contribute to an IRA and still be subject to AMT?   I&#039;m not a tax pro at all, but in my case I can&#039;t contribute to IRAs/Roths due to AGI, yet I still haven&#039;t been clipped by AMT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TFB-    I hope this isn&#8217;t too prying, but how can you contribute to an IRA and still be subject to AMT?   I&#8217;m not a tax pro at all, but in my case I can&#8217;t contribute to IRAs/Roths due to AGI, yet I still haven&#8217;t been clipped by AMT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

