<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Not 100% Stocks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancebuff.com/why-not-100-stocks_05.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/why-not-100-stocks_05.html</link>
	<description>like a friend telling you about money ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 11:06:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monevator</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/why-not-100-stocks_05.html#comment-8641</link>
		<dc:creator>Monevator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 14:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thefinancebuff.com/?p=69#comment-8641</guid>
		<description>I like the battery analogy, but the trouble is defining &quot;when the market is down&quot;.

In retrospect, 2007 when this was written was a great time to load up the battery with a big move into bonds. And of course late 2008 and 2009 was a great time to discharge it.

Now many people say the market looks peaky, and indeed it has started selling off. But if the S&amp;P is say 2000 in ten years time, it may seem like it was still &#039;down&#039; in the grander scheme of things.

This is a very good reason for mechanically rebalancing these things... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the battery analogy, but the trouble is defining &#8220;when the market is down&#8221;.</p>
<p>In retrospect, 2007 when this was written was a great time to load up the battery with a big move into bonds. And of course late 2008 and 2009 was a great time to discharge it.</p>
<p>Now many people say the market looks peaky, and indeed it has started selling off. But if the S&amp;P is say 2000 in ten years time, it may seem like it was still &#8216;down&#8217; in the grander scheme of things.</p>
<p>This is a very good reason for mechanically rebalancing these things&#8230; <img src='http://thefinancebuff.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TFB</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/why-not-100-stocks_05.html#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>TFB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thefinancebuff.com/?p=69#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Thank you, but the battery idea belongs to &lt;a href=&quot;http://makingourway.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;makingourway&lt;/a&gt;. I brought it up in case you didn&#039;t see it. He has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://makingourway.blogspot.com/2007/02/books-on-basic-investment-planning-role.html&quot;&gt;follow-up post&lt;/a&gt; too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, but the battery idea belongs to <a href="http://makingourway.blogspot.com/">makingourway</a>. I brought it up in case you didn&#8217;t see it. He has a <a href="http://makingourway.blogspot.com/2007/02/books-on-basic-investment-planning-role.html">follow-up post</a> too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Financial Journey</title>
		<link>http://thefinancebuff.com/why-not-100-stocks_05.html#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>My Financial Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thefinancebuff.com/?p=69#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Excellent points!!  I really like the battery idea and it very much fits with the long-term investors mentality.  I like this idea a lot.  As much as I&#039;m barking over at my site about 100% stocks it&#039;s just trying to get someone to stick my foot in my mouth with some solid counterpoints.  I really deep down think I should have some bonds and your post here might have just pushed me over that edge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points!!  I really like the battery idea and it very much fits with the long-term investors mentality.  I like this idea a lot.  As much as I&#8217;m barking over at my site about 100% stocks it&#8217;s just trying to get someone to stick my foot in my mouth with some solid counterpoints.  I really deep down think I should have some bonds and your post here might have just pushed me over that edge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

