Wall Street Journal ran an article by reporter Robin Sidel End Is Seen to Free Checking a week ago. Over the weekend, it published another article by the same reporter The New Bank Fees: How to Fight Back. Both articles said because new rules from the government will reduce banks’ revenue from overdraft fees and possibly debit card interchange fees charged to the stores, banks will stop offering free checking accounts.
I have two comments. The first one is:
Why should a checking account be free?
A checking account is a service provided by the banks. The service costs money to produce. There’s no reason it must be given out for free.
Free checking has been subsidized by overdraft fees. People on tight budget or those who don’t watch their balance carefully pay a much bigger share of the cost than others. That’s not fair, is it? The cost should be shared more equally among all customers. If that means there has to be a monthly fee, so be it.
My second comment is:
A checking account wants to be free.
That of course is a parallel to a famous declaration about information. While there might be an end to checking accounts absolutely free of any strings, I don’t see how the vast majority of customers will ever pay a monthly maintenance fee for their checking account.
The reason? Competition. A checking account is a commodity. There are more than 8,000 banks plus over 7,000 credit unions in this country. Someone, somewhere, will offer a free checking account for customers who refuse to pay a monthly fee. The incumbent banks know it. Therefore they will offer a way to make their checking account free: keep a minimum balance, open a savings account or CD, use online bill pay, use the debit card, get paperless statements, etc., etc.
When all is said and done, there will still be free checking. Don’t worry; it will not end.
Say No To Management Fees
If you are paying an advisor a percentage of your assets, you are paying 5-10x too much. Learn how to find an independent advisor, pay for advice, and only the advice.
Martin Farley says
I don’t believe that there is any simple connection between overdraft fees and free checking. Banks just balance the checking account costs with all their income and their other aims.
Since I first had a checking account 35 years ago, banks have gone in cycles on checking. There is a stage when bankers solemnly say that checking costs money and they have to recover the costs. Then, a stage follows when they decide that free checking is a way to attract customers who will do more profitable things, like borrow money. Then, it cycles back to the solemn statements about the cost of checking.
K3 says
While agreeing with the conclusion of this post, I disagree with the following, which sounds quite socialistic: “People on tight budget[s] or those who don’t watch their balance carefully pay a much bigger share of the cost than others. That’s not fair, is it? The cost should be shared more equally among all customers. If that means there has to be a monthly fee, so be it.”
First, there’s the false premise or non sequitur that those on a tight budget necessarily incur such fees. Being on a tight budget is no indication that you fail to properly manage your money, which is the real source of incurring such fees, as you correctly state regarding “those who don’t watch their balance carefully.”
Second, it is unclear why you feel that those who act irresponsibly, in the form of failing to properly manage their financial affairs and thus incurring such fees, should not bear the associated cost. This “share my pain” argument is highly reminiscent of the argument from the all the obese and other sickly folks who have irresponsibly managed their own health but now want all the healthier people to be in their insurance pool to (unfairly) absorb their disproportionate burden on the insurance program.
Harry Sit says
K3 – By tight budgets I meant not having a cushion in a checking account. If the balance fluctuates around $100, it requires a much higher level of effort to properly manage one’s money than if the account always has enough money to cover an entire month’s bills even if all come due on one day. The cost associated with covering an overdraft is maybe less than 10% of a typical $35 overdraft fee. The rest goes toward subsidizing free checking accounts for all. It’s not the same as your health care risk pool analogy.
anonymous says
You can always decline overdraft protection.
Also, it would seem to me that folks with higher amounts of money in their checking accounts are actually paying more to the bank. The interest rate difference between the rate that the bank gets and that it gives you, should be sufficient enough for checking account management costs. No?