The previous post Converting to Roth and Harvesting Capital Gains Under Obamacare Premium Subsidy shows when you are getting a premium subsidy for buying health insurance on the exchange under Obamacare, you face a marginal tax rate of about 25-30% for ordinary income and 10-15% for long-term capital gains, when normally ordinary income would be taxed at 15% and long-term capital gains would be tax free.
|MAGI||Ordinary Income||Long-Term Capital Gains|
|Below 300% FPL||~25-30%||~15%|
|300% – 400% FPL||24.5%||9.5%|
Before anyone complains about such high marginal tax rates at modest income levels, we should note that the marginal tax rate alone tells a very distorted story. The true measure of tax burden is the effective tax rate, in other words, the total tax paid on the total income received.
Marginal tax rate means the tax rate on the last dollar earned. Suppose I make $50k but I don’t pay tax on the first $49k. It doesn’t matter if I have to pay 90% tax on the last $1,000. I’m still only paying $900, or less than 2% of my income as tax, and I get to keep 98% of what I make. That 2% number is my effective tax rate.
Sure a very high marginal tax rate reduces my incentive to make more money, but it doesn’t mean I should complain about high taxes if I’m satisfied with what I keep ($49k in the hypothetical). One should complain only when the effective tax rate is high, not when the marginal tax rate is high.
When you get a premium subsidy for buying health insurance under Obamacare, your effective tax rate is often negative. Additional income will push that negative number up, from "very negative" to "not so negative." It is a 25-30% marginal tax rate alright but it’s hardly something worth complaining about.
For instance, suppose a married couple retired at age 60 on $40k of income from pre-tax IRA withdrawals. Suppose the cost of second least expensive Silver plan on the exchange costs $1,500 a month for the two of them. They will receive a $14,700 tax credit for buying health insurance. Their federal income tax before the tax credit is $5,100. After the tax credit, they are paying negative $9,600 in federal income tax.
Now they decide to convert $10k from traditional IRA to Roth. Their tax credit goes down to $13,250. Their tax before the tax credit goes up to $6,600. After the tax credit, they are still paying negative $6,650 in federal income tax.
From negative $9,600 to negative $6,650, that’s a massive tax increase of nearly $3,000, for a marginal tax rate of 30% on the additional $10k income. If you look at the overall picture though, you would agree that paying negative $9,600 in tax on $40k income is pretty awesome.
[Photo credit: Flickr user marsmet473a]
Instant diversification in a low-cost ETF portfolio. Convenient and disciplined with automatic rebalancing. Minimize your taxes. Betterment.com.